The author of Mein Kampf, a valid theory on how propaganda works, said propaganda is 90% emotional and 10% rational. The Obama phenomena proves this when it comes to politics and mass movements. Hitting the nerve of the masses emotionally is the key and this is exactly what Obama is doing as he leads people to believe he is the peace candidate while talking about expanding the war on terror.
To prove him wrong or to call him out all we have are the facts, and the rationale to connect a few dots. Doing this we can see Mr. O is a part of the Council On Foreign Relations establishment which manages our country’s war efforts. Then we see Mr. O is advised by Mr. Brzezinski to carry out the agenda he laid out in his book “The Grand Chessboard”. Next up according to the book is Pakistan and then Iran/Syria.
It is so simple and yet so hard to go against the grain when all you have on your side are the facts and the truth. You will never be more than 10% in the game.
The more wool you can pull the more you can get away with. Obama/Clinton/McCain are the smoke while Rome burns. Where is the fire department?
The Democrats are not the fire department. Either there is no water in the truck or the hose is too short. One thing for sure is, as long as this ‘war on terror’ continues the Democrats are complicit in this criminal war.
Tivana
PS - See this blog to get some of the facts about Obama. That is if you are one of the 10% that care for such things.
http://freedom-commentaries.blogspot.com/2008/02/clinton-and-obama-peaceful-candidates.html
Sunday, February 10, 2008
Clinton and Obama - Peaceful Candidates?
What an important discussion, great input on this relevant topic – PEACE!
Recently, Tom Hayden made the call for the peace movement to be louder in demanding candidates move toward peace. He then pointed out the differences between Obama and Clinton favoring Obama as being the most for peace. He left out one very important point, who are the advisors and potential cabinet members for each candidate.
Before my point, I would agree with Mary and Bruce that these are establishment candidates and it really does not matter who is running, they will all deliver the agenda to the rulers of our country; the Rothschilds (of the Federal reserve fame), and their many surrogates including: the Rockefellers (the controllers of Exxon and Chase Manhattan Bank), the Morgans (banking), Murdcoh (media), and the managers of the US government, the Council Of Foreign Relations. Both Obama and Clinton are members of the CFR as well as McCain.
“Give me control over a nation’s currency, and I care not who makes the laws.” Mayer Rothschild
“To control the economy one controls countries, to control the food supply one controls the people”. Henry Kissinger
“The ultimate independence is to grow your own food and sell, trade, or give away the surplus.” Michael Tivana
The chief advisors:
Obama =
Brzezinski, noted author and past Secretary of Defense his book “The Grand Chessboard” has an agenda to install a world government. This is the playbook for our daily news. US foreign policy is taken from this book including the Project for the New American Century, and the Bush Doctrine. Mr. B writes about the coming World government and society in feudalistic terms proposing victory by having the vassals compliant and keeping the barbarians from coming together. I do not want to live in a feudal society because I don’t think I will be living behind the castle walls. Having Mr. B as a chief advisor is a HUGE, Oh NO! for me.
Anthony Lake, the main force behind the US invasion of Haiti;
General Merrill McPeak, an Air Force man, who not long after the Dili massacre in East Timor in ’91 oversaw the delivery to Indonesia of US fighter planes
former counterterrorism czar Richard Clarke
former Middle East negotiator Dennis Ross – Main project: play the Arabs against the Iranians to perpetuate Israeli occupation of the West Bank and Gaza.
Obama pledges unfaltering military support to Israel
Obama adviser, Sarah Sewall, who heads a human rights center at Harvard and is a former Defense official, she wrote the introduction to General Petraeus’s Marine Corps/Army counterinsurgency handbook, the handbook that is now being used worldwide by US troops in various killing operations.
Regarding Iran's nuclear program, Obama states “We should take no option, including military action, off the table”.
Obama advocates troops in Iraq be redeployed to Pakistan and Afghanistan to fight amorphous groups of “terrorists”.
Obama has stated on Aug. 1, 2007 that he would send troops into Pakistan to hunt down terrorists even without local permission.
"Let me make this clear," Obama said, "there are terrorists holed up in those mountains who murdered 3,000 Americans. They are plotting to strike again. It was a terrible mistake to fail to act when we had a chance to take out an al Qaeda leadership meeting in 2005. If we have actionable intelligence about high-value terrorist targets and President Musharraf won't act, we will."
Obama does not believe nuclear weapons should be used – however, his policy still backs preemptive strikes and the further militarization of the middle east, all at the expense of US resources.
Obama outlines his ambitious geopolitical plans in a recent essay for Foreign Affairs magazine, August, 2007. Foreign Affairs is published by the Council on Foreign Relations, which describes itself as a non-partisan group of which he is a member.
Clinton =
Advisers to Hillary Rodham Clinton include many former top officials in President Clinton's administration: former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, former National Security Adviser Samuel Berger, former UN Ambassador Richard Holbrooke.
Clinton signed the bill declaring the Iranian National Guard a terrorist organization – not good
As far as the peace movement’s choices go, we have two war lusting sheep. I am going with the Clinton, 1) she is a woman 2) she has fewer war lusting advisors.
Peace,
Michael Tivana
Recently, Tom Hayden made the call for the peace movement to be louder in demanding candidates move toward peace. He then pointed out the differences between Obama and Clinton favoring Obama as being the most for peace. He left out one very important point, who are the advisors and potential cabinet members for each candidate.
Before my point, I would agree with Mary and Bruce that these are establishment candidates and it really does not matter who is running, they will all deliver the agenda to the rulers of our country; the Rothschilds (of the Federal reserve fame), and their many surrogates including: the Rockefellers (the controllers of Exxon and Chase Manhattan Bank), the Morgans (banking), Murdcoh (media), and the managers of the US government, the Council Of Foreign Relations. Both Obama and Clinton are members of the CFR as well as McCain.
“Give me control over a nation’s currency, and I care not who makes the laws.” Mayer Rothschild
“To control the economy one controls countries, to control the food supply one controls the people”. Henry Kissinger
“The ultimate independence is to grow your own food and sell, trade, or give away the surplus.” Michael Tivana
The chief advisors:
Obama =
Brzezinski, noted author and past Secretary of Defense his book “The Grand Chessboard” has an agenda to install a world government. This is the playbook for our daily news. US foreign policy is taken from this book including the Project for the New American Century, and the Bush Doctrine. Mr. B writes about the coming World government and society in feudalistic terms proposing victory by having the vassals compliant and keeping the barbarians from coming together. I do not want to live in a feudal society because I don’t think I will be living behind the castle walls. Having Mr. B as a chief advisor is a HUGE, Oh NO! for me.
Anthony Lake, the main force behind the US invasion of Haiti;
General Merrill McPeak, an Air Force man, who not long after the Dili massacre in East Timor in ’91 oversaw the delivery to Indonesia of US fighter planes
former counterterrorism czar Richard Clarke
former Middle East negotiator Dennis Ross – Main project: play the Arabs against the Iranians to perpetuate Israeli occupation of the West Bank and Gaza.
Obama pledges unfaltering military support to Israel
Obama adviser, Sarah Sewall, who heads a human rights center at Harvard and is a former Defense official, she wrote the introduction to General Petraeus’s Marine Corps/Army counterinsurgency handbook, the handbook that is now being used worldwide by US troops in various killing operations.
Regarding Iran's nuclear program, Obama states “We should take no option, including military action, off the table”.
Obama advocates troops in Iraq be redeployed to Pakistan and Afghanistan to fight amorphous groups of “terrorists”.
Obama has stated on Aug. 1, 2007 that he would send troops into Pakistan to hunt down terrorists even without local permission.
"Let me make this clear," Obama said, "there are terrorists holed up in those mountains who murdered 3,000 Americans. They are plotting to strike again. It was a terrible mistake to fail to act when we had a chance to take out an al Qaeda leadership meeting in 2005. If we have actionable intelligence about high-value terrorist targets and President Musharraf won't act, we will."
Obama does not believe nuclear weapons should be used – however, his policy still backs preemptive strikes and the further militarization of the middle east, all at the expense of US resources.
Obama outlines his ambitious geopolitical plans in a recent essay for Foreign Affairs magazine, August, 2007. Foreign Affairs is published by the Council on Foreign Relations, which describes itself as a non-partisan group of which he is a member.
Clinton =
Advisers to Hillary Rodham Clinton include many former top officials in President Clinton's administration: former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, former National Security Adviser Samuel Berger, former UN Ambassador Richard Holbrooke.
Clinton signed the bill declaring the Iranian National Guard a terrorist organization – not good
As far as the peace movement’s choices go, we have two war lusting sheep. I am going with the Clinton, 1) she is a woman 2) she has fewer war lusting advisors.
Peace,
Michael Tivana
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)